Below is the text from an article by C.J. Hirschfield, Executive Director of Children's Fairyland, originally printed in the Piedmont Post. PDF version here.
On Thursday night January 5, more than 250 people sat shoulder to shoulder in a room in East Oakland's Lighthouse Community Charter School and listened to a story about car keys. By the end of the story, most of us were ready to embark on a quest to do whatever we can to make Oakland's public schools great.
The storyteller was Colorado State Senator Mike Johnston, a former teacher who co-founded New Leaders for New Schools, a national non-profit that recruits and trains urban principals. Johnston, who looks younger than his 37 years, is a national leader in the field of student-centered education reform, an issue many of us consider the next big civil rights issue.
Which is how Johnston came to be the keynote speaker at a sold-out fundraiser for Great Oakland Public Schools, an organization committed to ensuring that all Oakland students have the opportunity to attend quality public schools.
Johnston's story was about a woman whose role in the original civil rights movement was not familiar to any of us in the room that night. He set it up for us: The year was 1955 and Montgomery, Alabama, had started a bus boycott sparked by Rosa Parks' refusal to give up her seat for a white per- son. Organizers realized that the boycott needed to last for longer than a single day to be successful. Montgomery residents needed to refuse to ride the buses completely. But how could people get to work and home without the public transit they depended on?
After the first day, a large group gathered to figure out how to solve the problem.
"I have a car," said a black woman named Mary Jo Smiley. She offered to lend her support to the movement by transporting boycotters to and from work and other places they needed to go. She said she figured she could help 20 people each day, and she was proud to do it.
And that's what she did.
The authorities noticed. Smiley was arrested after driving her friends and jailed for conspiracy. Boycott organizers gave her the option to stop her work for the cause. Her response?
"I need my car keys." She knew there were 20 people who wouldn't be able to make it to work, to the bank, to shop without her help.
Smiley continued driving boycotters immediately after her release from jail - day after day, for 381 days. Years later, Mary Jo Smiley - now the Rev. Mary Jo Smiley - told the Montgomery Advertiser: "The people of Montgomery made that boycott successful. The leaders had the strategy, but the people had the strength."
Why did Mike Johnston tell us that story in Oakland, in 2012? Because he knows that school re- form won't be easy, but he's in it for the long haul. He knows that if we focus on students, effective teachers, strong leadership, individualized education, empowered school communities, choice about schools and one vision for Oakland, success will follow. He was urging us to grab our metaphorical car keys and start driving.
For more information about Great Oakland Public Schools, visit www.gopublicschools.org.
C.J. Hirschfield is Executive Director of Children's Fairyland, which is located next to Lake Merritt at 699 Bellevue Avenue, Oakland. For more information call 452-2259 or e-mail cj@fairyland.org.
GO Fundraiser with Senator Mike Johnston - Live Twitter Feed
During our event the evening of Thursday, January 5th, watch this page for live Tweets from those attending the event.
Join the conversation using hashtag #go2012.
We're 23 days away.
By: Jessica Stewart
I
was at the GO Holiday Party a few weeks ago when someone shared with me
that Senator Mike Johnston is the subject of one of the chapter's of
Tom Friedman's new book (That Used to Be Us).
It made me even more proud that Senator Johnston will be joining us in just a few weeks to help raise money for GO's work in 2012.
So
far, 141 people have purchased their ticket to support GO and be sure
they have a spot at a fantastic Oakland education event. If you haven't
reserved yours yet, be sure to do that soon. The early bird tickets are only available for two more days (until Friday).
I
got my hands on a copy of Friedman's book so that I could see the
section about Senator Johnston. Here is one of my favorite excerpts from
that chapter that has a good analogy about where education stands
today:
"Johnston
said that when he thinks about the change that he and others are trying
to effect in education, he thinks back to attending President Obama's
inauguration in Washington. What impressed him most was seeing a platoon
of wheelchairs parting the crowd on the Mall after the president took
the oath. Sitting in them were the surviving Tuskegee Airman, the first
African American aviators in te United States armed forces, who flew
many successful missions in World War II.
"What
I realized was that they lived in a moment when people didn't believe
it was possible - they didn't believe that a black man had the courage
or intelligence or stamina to fly one of America's most expensive
warplanes," Johnson recalled. "So they said, 'Put me up in the air and
let me show you,' and they became one of the only air squadrons in WWII
who never lost a bomber." And of course they could and did become
successful pilots. "And when they did, the world changed- because the
argument about whether or not we were all created equal was once and for
all over, and nothing else could have happened but that Truman would
eventually integrate the air force, or that Johnson would sign the Civil
Rights Act, or that sixty years later we would inaugurate the first
black president.
"Education
needs its own Tuskegee moment. One reason we have not been able ot
galvanize the whole community for educational reform, "Johnston
concluded, "is that some people still don't believe that every one of
our kids can compete with the smartest kids from Singapore and China.
It's our responsibility to get up in the air and prove them wrong. Then
the whole world changes."
Senator Johnston led historic legislation
in Colorado that brought together Republicans, Democrats, union
leaders, district leaders, and others to support effective educators in
Colorado classrooms. He also co-founded New Leaders for New Schools and was one of President Obama's top three education advisors. He is also the author of In the Deep Heart's Core, a book he wrote after being a teacher in the Mississippi Delta. He was also recently named to Time Magazine's 40 Under 40List.
Needless
to say, the conversation we're going to have on January 5th with Mike
is going to be inspiring and interesting, and I hope you're a part of
it. Get your ticket here.
Over the last few months, our network has hosted many house party gatherings across the city with their neighbors to hear from Oaklanders what they are thinking about education in our city. We took the several hundred responses and created this word cloud to visually represent what is on the mind of our city. Click here to view a larger version.
Top Five Reasons
By: Jessica Stewart
"He is the best speaker I've ever heard."
That's
Meg Stewart, Oakland teacher at Bret Harte Middle School. She got the
chance to hear Colorado Senator Mike Johnston, a clear leader in the
education community, speak earlier this year. We agree with Meg, so we
asked Mike to join us in January for a GO Public Schools fundraiser.
Here are my Top Five Reasons to join us for this event on January 5th:
5. It's a great chance to see your fellow education advocates and meet some great new friends and make connections.
4. The event benefits Great Oakland Public School's work in 2012, which will be a truly crucial year Oakland education.
3. Mike Johnston is an impressive leader in the education movement. Check out one of his past speeches here on YouTube.
2.
For the next few weeks, the early-bird tickets to the fundraiser are
cheaper than they will be once we all go on winter vacation.
1. It's sure to be a thought-provoking discussion and a fun, interesting crowd.
You
may be familiar with Mike's work in Colorado and his leadership
nationally as one of President Obama's top three education policy
advisors to President Obama during the 2008 campaign and as a co-founder
of New Leaders for New Schools. He also opened and led Mapleton
Expeditionary School of Arts, a public district high school in
Colorado. In May 2008, MESA became the first public high school
in Colorado to get all 100 percent of its seniors admitted to
four-year colleges.
We'll
be kicking off at 6:30 PM on Thursday, January 5th at Lighthouse
Community School at 444 Hegenberger and we hope you'll be there with us.
Buy your ticket here and then join the Facebook event to get the conversation started.
I'll see you in January!
P.S.
That night (January 5th) is my birthday, and I can't think of any
better way to spend it than with others who care just as deeply about
having a great school for every kid in Oakland! I hope you'll join us.
This year, we had more than five times as many applicants for our summer fellowship as last year. The group we have selected for this summer is a diverse group that brings in an exciting set of skills and knowledge to contribute. Fellows will be working on projects involving teacher effectiveness, outreach to our community, fundraising, and much more.
John Baldo John recently taught Pre-Algebra and Geometry in Oakland as a Teach for America corps member. He graduated from the University of Southern California with a bachelor's degree in computer science and a minor in political science with an emphasis in law and public policy. He has a keen interest in the intersection of technology and education, especially longitudinal data systems. During his time at USC, he advocated for improved student services as a director in the undergraduate student government. He also served as a leader in a grassroots campaign to make USC a more sustainable community.
Sandrena Frischer
Sandrena is an undergrad at UC Berkeley, studying Education and
International Area Studies, with a focus on human security and conflict
resolution. As a volunteer at Manzanita Community School in Oakland, she
gained experience working in an urban education environment. As a
volunteer for Amigos de las Americas in Panama and the Dominican
Republic, she taught classes about health, the environment, and youth
leadership to elementary school students in rural communities. She is a
Bay Area Native, and is interested in education policy and education as a
means for social change.
Jordan Haedtler A graduate of the George Washington University, Jordan is a passionate political organizer, writer, and education reform advocate. Jordan has years of experience on grassroots campaigns and with non-profits, working on a wide array of issues. Whether working to pass a renewable electricity standard through Congress, persuading California voters to approve high speed rail, or fighting unjust prison sentence disparities, Jordan has brought dedication to his advocacy. Most recently, Jordan managed a state legislative race in Southeastern Pennsylvania, selected by the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee as one of "40 Essential Races" nationwide. In his spare time, he sings barbershop harmony with competitive quartets and choruses.
Jack Holzman Jack Holzman just completed his first year as a seventh grade math teacher at Elmhurst Community Prep in East Oakland and a 2010 Teach For America Corps Member. While obtaining his bachelor's degree in Computer Science at the University of Illinois, Jack served as an engagement partner for OTCR Consulting, a student-run business and technical consulting firm. This position was heavily focused on project management, staff development, and data analysis. Jack currently resides in Oakland.
Reed Matheny Reed has been teaching in various capacities for over nine years, tutoring in private and public schools and volunteering as an English teacher through Learning Enterprises in Panama. He has just completed a Master's degree in English Literature at Stanford University, where he also co-founded Ithaka, a thriving 20-person co-op. He is excited to shift his focus from teaching to education advocacy this summer with GO Public Schools. If he's not working for social justice in education, you might find him cooking, reading Joyce or climbing trees in the East Bay hills.
Chinere McDaniels Chinere McDaniels has been teaching in Oakland Unified for the last 3 years. She is currently a Kindergarten teacher at Hoover elementary. Chinere is passionate about our youth and has strong interest in creating educational opportunities for Oakland youth where there were none. She is an advocate for youth, a mentor and counselor. She has participated in summer camps, tutoring and extracurricular activities with her students. Her favorite quotes are "it takes a village to raise a child" and "the journey of a million steps starts with the first step". She believes that as a community we have the ability to change Oakland's future for the better -- one small step at a time.
Tara Ramanathan Tara's work focuses on the intersection where education, poverty, and policy meet. In 2006 she authored a chapter in the book Poverty in India, in which she analyzed major lessons learned on poverty alleviation strategies in developing and developed countries. Her Honors thesis in Economics investigated successful microfinance programs in developing countries, and their application as alternative forms of education in the United States. After graduating, Tara taught in a low-performing school in Richmond with Teach for America; and then joined a research team at UC Berkeley to evaluate the efficacy of Teach for America corps members in boosting achievement among low-performing students. Tara has played a key leadership role in a number of successful campaigns, including the University of California campaign that led to the UC Regents divestment from Darfur; for which she was recognized with the Brutten Philanthropic Organization of the Year Award.
Sara Salas As an undergraduate at UC Berkeley, Sara worked with various academic outreach programs serving youth throughout the East Bay. For two years, she served as Team Leader and Volunteer Coordinator for a non-profit organization promoting early childhood education. She also worked as a College Advocate at a local high school where she facilitated CAHSEE and SAT preparation seminars, as well as coordinated the annual College Fair. As a Staff Tutor for Berkeley Unified School District, she provided one-on-one academic support and college application advising. During her last semester, Sara participated in a language and culture program in Brazil where she conducted research on that country's affirmative action initiative in public university admissions. Through this fellowship, she hopes to gain valuable exposure in grassroots organizing and collaborate on progressive reforms for public education in Oakland.
Stephanie Wong Stephanie is a rising senior at UC Berkeley, studying Media Studies, with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice. Her ties to Oakland public schools began three years ago, when she first became a tutor and mentor for Oakland Asian Students Educational Services (OASES). Since then, she has continued to volunteer with OASES and interned at the U.S. Department of Education. Most recently, she helped instruct a Berkeley undergraduate course on "Current Issues in Education," deconstructing and analyzing the social, political, and economic issues that affect education. She is passionate about social justice, human rights, education, and journalism, all of which help drive her educational interests and experiences.
If you are interested in hearing about future fellowship opportunities this fall and in the future, please join our email list at http://www.gopublicschools.org/.
Have questions about Oakland Unifiedʼs (OUSD) 2011-12 budget? Below is
an overview of both the OUSD and State budget contexts, as well as some
questions posed by GO Public Schools. Key OUSD Background 1. OUSD still does not know how much money it will get from the State of California. 2. Cuts are estimated to be between $349-844 per pupil (between $12.5 and $30.5 M for OUSD). 3. OUSD needs to be prepared to cut up to $844 in per pupil funding ($30.5 M total) from its budget. 4. On April 6th, OUSD staff gave the School Board a list of 11 possible cuts totaling about $60M.
The BIG Budget Picture 1. The State decides how much money OUSD gets. 2. The OUSD Board of Education decides how to spend the money it gets from the state. 3. OUSD staff gives the Board of Education options to create a district budget. 4. The OUSD Board of Education either (a) accepts the staff's options, or (b) asks the staff for more options.
GO Public Schools proposes the following questions:
1. Central Office Cuts: Why werenʼt more Central Office budget cuts proposed? The
Central Office is budgeted $33.7M of "unrestricted" funds. This year,
every OUSD School Site had to look closely are each program and staff
member and make painful cuts. The Districtʼs Central Office should do
the same. As a start, OUSD should publicly, and in an accessible format,
examine the budgets of (1) Professional Development; and (2) Full
Service Community Schools. Both of these budgets are large, and it is
unclear if they are providing core services (e.g., direct student
services, mandatory staff support). GO understands that the Central
Office needs funding so that the district can function.
2. School Site Cuts: Why do schools sites have to cut so much? Why
isn't reducing the current level of school site cuts--$349 per
pupil--among the options presented? We do not have to cut school site
budgets by $349 per pupil in order to balance the budget. For example,
School Sites could reduce their budgets by $150 and OUSD could make
other cuts to balance the budget. When the School Sites cut $349 per
pupil out of their budgets it meant losing 137 teacher positions, and
many classified staff positions. 3. Restricted Funds: Will OUSD give more "restricted funds" to school sites? For
example, "Title I" money is given to OUSD to help children in poverty.
OUSD currently uses $2.9M of its Title I funds for "oversight" and
"indirect costs." This is the legal maximum that OUSD is allowed to use
for that purpose. If OUSD reduced the cost of its oversight, these funds
could be given to the school sites to directly benefit students.
4. Structural Deficit:
What will OUSD do to address the structural deficit before next yearʼs
budget? A "Structural Deficit" means that the district spends more than
it brings in. Right now, in order to meet community concerns, the
district is suggesting that we use a lot of "one time" money - that is,
money that we only have this year to solve our budget problems. As a
community we have to think about what happens next year.
5. Temporary Teachers:
What is the plan to help the ʻtemporaryʼ teachers who taught for most
of the year return to their classrooms? Last year, OUSD hired both
ʻpermanentʼ and ʻtemporaryʼ teachers. Some ʻtemporaryʼ teachers were in
the classroom all year, but because they were temporary they are being
removed from the classroom.
Click here to view this as a PDF in English and Spanish.
Budget Crisis Update
On April 6th, OUSD's Board of Education met for a study session on the budget crisis, hearing a Special Presentation to the Board from District leadership. Below, we have summarized (1) the current situation, (2) the possible cuts proposed by the District, (3) the District's recommended cuts, (4) an update on teacher layoffs, and (5) the questions that GO was left with after the presentation. Click here to download a user-friendly PDF with this information.
Last year, OUSD received $5,239 per pupil. Vernon Hal, the District's
Chief Financial Officer, shared that OUSD had been preparing for a $349
per pupil funding cut ($12.5 M reduction overall). With the breakdown
of budget talks in Sacramento, it is now preparing for $844 per pupil
cuts ($30.5 M reduction overall).
It Could Get Worse
The $844 cut in per pupil funding is based on two assumptions: (1)
the taxes proposed for the November ballot do not pass; and (2) the
state education budget does not receive additional cuts during the state
budget process. If the tax extensions pass, Oakland will get more
money. If the state education budget gets cut, Oakland will receive less
money.
The Board's Priorities
For the purposes of Wednesday's study session, the question of how to
cut the budget focused around the Board's three priorities: (1)
Increase Teacher Retention; (2) Eliminate the Structural Deficit; and
(3) Increase Employee Compensation.
Options
According to Hal, OUSD needs to prepare for a $30.5M budget cut. He
said there are four strategies to manage the budget, and proposed $58.5M
in possibilities:
Increase the General Fund ("Revenue Enhancement")
Spend Less ("Expense Decreases")
Transfer part of the OUSD Fund Balance (Money the district has for unanticipated expenses, etc.)
Decrease "Proposed Expense Increases"
1. Increase the General Fund. (The General Fund is the budget category that is used to fund school sites and the Central Office.)
Flex Adult Education ($6.2M): This option cuts $6.2M of
Adult Education funding and adds it to the General Fund so it can be
used by K-12 school sites. $1M would remain in Adult Education.
Flex Adult Education's Unallocated Budget ($2.5M): This
option cuts Adult Education's $2.5M Unallocated Fund Balance and adds it
to the General Fund so it can be used by K-12 students.
Use the State Loan ($2.1M): This option would use $2.1M
that OUSD has remaining from its $100M loan from the state, and puts it
into the General Fund so it can be used by K-12 students.
2. Spend less.
Cut to School Sites ($14.6M): This option would reduce
OUSD's expenses by keeping the $14.6M cut to school site budgets made
under Results Based Budgeting. This is the cut that was made when the
district asked schools to prepare a site budget based on a $349 per
pupil funding cut.
Cut Early Retirement Fund ($2M): This option would reduce OUSD's expenses by not spending $2M of the $6.4M Early Retirement Fund this year.
Cut Some Music Teachers ($320,000): This option reduces
expenses by cutting 4 of the 20 centrally funded music teachers.
'Centrally funded' means that these teachers are paid by the central
office rather than school sites.
Maximize Elementary Class Sizes ($6.6M): This option would
reduce OUSD's expenses by maximizing elementary school class-sizes to
contract maximums. This means approximately 90 fewer full time teachers
at school sites.
3. Transfer Part of the Fund Balance to the General Fund.
Fund Balance (Up to $19M): In this option, OUSD adds part
of its $19M "Fund Balance" to the General Fund. The "Fund Balance" is
money OUSD has not spent (for a variety of reasons, such as to pay audit
fines, in case of economic uncertainty, etc.).
4. Decrease Proposed "Expense Increases."
(These are expenses that OUSD planned to increase, but Hal is
suggesting the District could choose not to go forward with the
increase.)
Salary Increase ($2M): OUSD had proposed to give its staff a 2% salary increase. Choosing not to give this raise would save OUSD $2M.
Flex Adult Ed. Funds ($3M): OUSD had planned to use $3M in
Adult Education Funds to pay for high school counseling, literacy, and
A-G (college prep) offerings. Not offering these services would save
OUSD $3M.
Summer School Funding ($543,000): OUSD had budgeted $543,000 for non-salary expenses related to summer school. Cutting these expenses would save $543,000.
District staff recommends that OUSD does the following:
1. Increase the General Fund
Flex all Adult Education Funds except for $1M
Flex Adult Education's Unallocated $2.5M
Use $2.1M of the State Loan
2. Spend Less
Reduce school site budgets by $349 per pupil
Keep the Early Retirement Fund fully funded
Do not eliminate the 4 centrally funded music teachers
Do not maximize elementary schools to class-size maximums
3. Fund Balance
Use $8.5M of OUSD's Fund Balance. This leaves $10.5M in the fund.
4. Reduce Proposed increases
Do not give employees a 2% raise
Do not cut the funding increase for high school counseling, A-G, etc.
Do not cut the budget for Summer School
Regarding Teachers Barbara Gee, Director of Human
Resources, acknowledged the great concern and anxiety in the district
over the number of teacher layoff notices issued. She presented
information about a group of schools with over 25% turnover rate.
Regarding the teacher layoffs, Gee shared that while there is still
uncertainty, if the district uses its one-time monies (flexing adult
education, for example), it should be able to hold steady and reduce the
number of layoffs significantly. That said, there would still be
layoffs.
According to Gee, when school sites designed their budgets earlier
this year, it resulted in approximately 137 consolidated positions.
Note: a consolidated position occurs when a teacher's position is cut
due to budget or program cuts. Over the past few weeks, the HR
Department has collected information about the number of teachers who
are: (1) retiring, (2) not being asked to return, and (3) temporary
teachers. They discovered that there are at total of 233 teachers who are not, at present, returning to the district.
Jody
London asked about the timeline for rescinding layoff notices.
Jacqueline Minor, OUSD's attorney, said they were waiting for a hearing
to happen on April 15, and Superintendent Smith indicated that they
would move as quickly as possible.
Our Questions
1. Additional Options: Why weren't more possible cuts proposed through Central Office budget cuts?
There
are currently $33.7M of unrestricted funds budgeted for Central Office
expenses. However, cutting centrally funded teachers was the only
central cut presented to the Board on April 6th. Every OUSD school site
has closely evaluated each program to ensure that it is core and adding
value to students. We ask that the District publicly, and in an
accessible format, examine the budgets of (1) Professional Development;
and (2) Full Service Community Schools Departments. Both of these
budgets are large, and it is unclear if they are providing core
services.
GO respects and recognizes the importance of the
Central Office, and understands that it needs to be resourced to enable
the district to function and advance the strategic plan. However, each
department's budget needs to be closely examined to ensure that it is
providing an indispensable service.
2. School Site Cuts:
Given the range of options, it is clear that we could balance the budget
even if we reduced the school site cuts. For example, the sites could
reduce their budgets by $150 per pupil instead of $349 per pupil. Why
isn't reducing the current level of cuts ($349 per pupil at school
sites) among the options presented?
For example, if OUSD cut central office operations costs by 3%, it
would mean a $1M savings. School site cuts could be reduced from
approximately $14M to $13M, thus sparing teacher positions and support
staff.
3. Restricted Funds: Will the District present options for passing more "restricted funds" to school sites?
For
example, the District currently uses $2.9M of Title I funds for
District oversight and "indirect costs." This is 15% of all District
Title I money; funds which are intended to help children in poverty. If
the District reduced the cost of its oversight, these funds could be
passed to the school sites to benefit students.
4. Structural Deficit: How will OUSD work to address the long-term structural deficit prior to another year of budget cuts?
Note:
Structural deficit refers to when, over time, the district spends more
than it brings in. We can eliminate pain this year, but what happens
next year?
5. Temporary Teachers: Last year, OUSD hired
both permanent and temporary teachers with similar credentials. What is
the plan to help temporary teachers return to their school sites?
6.
Teacher layoffs and communication: How is information about the budget
and staff layoffs being communicated district-wide? What steps are being
taken to ensure that those who received layoff notices know that they
are valued and that the district is doing everything it can to retain
them?
After the presentation, the Board engaged with Hal on several points.
The current $349 cuts to school sites: Hal said that the district would not re-open the RBB process to reduce the cuts to school sites.
Furlough Days: Staff presented information that
district-wide furlough days would result in savings of $1.3M per day,
but noted that this would have to be negotiated with unions.
Instructional days would be preserved as much as possible, with
furloughs proposed for non-instructional days. Director Dobbins asked
what other districts are doing regarding furlough days. Hal replied
that some were using up to 10 days.
Classified Staff (non-teachers): Alice Spearman asked about
classified staff, expressing concern that adequate levels of service
would not be provided to students at school sites if schools cut
classified staff to save teacher jobs. Hal replied that some classified
services, such as custodians, were centrally funded, and that the
district worked with school sites to make sure minimum standards were
followed. School sites do, however, have flexibility around how they
spend their money on classified staff.
Adult Education: Jody London asked what would be left of
Adult Education if we flexed all but $1M of the funding, and wondered
what other districts are doing regarding Adult Ed. funding. Maria Santos
replied that most services would be gone, except for a few such as
basic GED, and that many districts have cut it entirely.
A-G Requirements: Spearman asked whether it is possible that OUSD would relax or suspend the A-G graduation requirement. Hal said 'no.'
Strategic Plan: Gary Yee asked how the budget impacted the
district's strategic plan. Maria Santos replied that the resources
necessary to implement the strategic plan had been protected.
Facilities: Jumoke Hinton-Hodge asked if the district was
going to "flex" any of the money used for facilities upkeep. Hal said
'no' because the district needs to take care of its buildings.
Please note: The above information reflects our best understanding of
what was presented on April 6th. We have tried to characterize the main
points from the conversation, and provide links to relevant resources.
If you have comments, questions, or further ideas, please share them here.
Key questions, research, and data that can help
inform the critical conversations being held at the 2011 Oakland Teacher
Convention
On Thursday evening, over 200 of Oakland's
best teachers will be attending Oakland's first Teacher Convention.
OUSD's Effective Teaching Task Force organized this two-and-a-half day
convention, where teacher leaders will collaborate to define the
priorities for a five-year strategic plan that will address teacher
evaluation, compensation, site-based conditions, recruitment, retention,
and professional development.
To help inform the critical conversations that will be taking place at the convention, GO Public Schools Information Center
staff, board members, and policy fellows, in collaboration with members
of the GO community, compiled the guide below with key questions, research, and data.
We acknowledge that:
Funding stability and adequacy are arguably the most important conditions to support our teachers.
Many conditions necessary to support teachers are not discussed in this guide.
OUSD has many good policies and practices that support effective teaching that should be continued.
The
teachers who participate in the convention this week will bring a
wealth of perspectives, knowledge, and understanding far beyond what our
small group of educators and community have compiled.
How can OUSD's central office services support effective teaching?
How can OUSD's salary schedule be modified to help retain teachers?
What conditions, inside and outside of school, support effective teaching?
The
teachers who participate in the convention this week will bring a
wealth of perspectives, knowledge, and understanding far beyond what our
small group of educators and community has compiled. We look forward to
hearing about the conversations that emerge from a successful
convention, and to partnering with teachers and the district to turn the
ideas from the convention into actions to support teachers and
students. Congratulations to the Oakland Unified School District and the
Oakland Education Association for creating this opportunity for Oakland
teachers.
The
coming six weeks are critical for OUSD students. The Board of Education
is grappling with the state-wide budget crisis and will soon decide
whether to lay off over 500 teachers and how to cut at least $30.5
million from the OUSD budget. To date, school sites have been asked to
shoulder the majority of budget cuts.
Your
voice needs to be a part of this conversation. Attend the Board of
Education's Special Budget Meeting TONIGHT, April 6, at 5pm at the Board
Room, 1025 Second Avenue. (Public comment follows staff presentations)
GO
commends the efforts of principals from elementary, middle, and high
schools across Oakland who have been working hard to make sure that
students stay at the center of the discussion. For the past several
weeks, a group of principals has been meeting (with support from GO
Public Schools and OCO) to review the 2011-2012 budget, sharing
information, polling colleagues, and collecting data about the potential
impact of the budget cuts on students and school communities across the
city.
The principals' presentation,available here, includes both facts and the recommendations that they will be sharing tonight.
Facts:
Schools cut $350 per pupil in Results Based Budgeting (RBB) for the 2011-2012 school year.
The State says we need to cut at least $825 per pupil next year.
OUSD leadership recently reversed its position of no central cuts, and has indicated that they can cut $350 per pupil.
At high poverty schools, cuts may eliminate the supports students need to access core programs.
As
a result of the state budget crisis, more than 18,500 pink-slips were
sent to California teachers on March 15. Here in Oakland, the district
issued 538 layoff notices to certificated district employees.
A state policy
known as "last-in, first-out" (LIFO) determines which teachers receive
pink slips. Teachers, students, and families city-wide have been stunned
by both the sheer number of layoffs and the recognition that LIFO
policies hit some schools harder than others.
Those schools hit hardest tend to be in the city's poorest
neighborhoods, often with the highest levels of crime, lowest levels of
student achievement, and highest levels of teacher turnover.
Sacramento City protects students' constitutional rights.
In
Sacramento City, Superintendent Jonathan Raymond and the Board of
Education sought to protect students in the six "Superintendent's
Priority Schools" from the effects of teacher layoffs. These
academically troubled schools, where the district had difficulty
recruiting staff, were identified
in March 2010 as part of an effort to improve under-performing schools
that had failed to adequately serve students. Students at these six
schools will not experience the devastating effects of teacher layoffs
because none of their teachers will be laid off for the 2011-2012 school
year.
Using the Law to Protect: Sacramento City's action
to protect students is based on a state law that calls for two important
exceptions to seniority-based lay-offs ("Skipping"). Under the
Education Code, Districts are allowed to deviate from seniority-based
layoffs:
1. for hard-to-staff fields (such as special education, math, or science), Cal. Educ. Code §44955(d)(1); and 2.
"for purposes of maintaining or achieving compliance with
constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws."
Cal. Educ. Code § 4955(d)(2).
(Click here to read about the settlement in LAUSD that complies with this provision).
From the Resolution, Sacramento City's "Skipping Criteria" include the following:
1. individuals with the following certifications:
BCLAD (bilingual)
Special Education
High school math
2. individuals teaching in Priority Schools (the 6 schools designated by the Superintendent) [emphasis added]
3. individuals with the following experiences:
one or more years teaching in the Dual-Language Immersion Program
two or more years teaching and/or specialized training in a home or hospital setting
formal Waldorf method training
experience in the Accelerated Academy Program
What can Oakland Unified do now? OUSD
must use the power it already possesses under the Education Code to
uphold students' constitutional, fundamental right to basic equality of
educational opportunity. Current law (Education Code) requires a
district to deviate from seniority-based layoffs "for purposes of
maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements
related to equal protection of the laws." Cal. Educ. Code § 44955(d)(2).
Rescinding Layoff Notices:
The first step is to figure out how to rescind the layoff notices that
have already been issued. Recognizing the no teacher layoff is good,
OUSD should begin by working with the Oakland Education Association
(OEA) and community groups to develop criteria for how to rescind the
layoff notices issued on March 15. OEA President Betty Olson-Jones, in a
March 22 open letter to the community, states that the OEA is "open to
creative suggestions that will help minimize the instability caused by
massive layoffs[.]"[1]
The criteria should be developed by OUSD, OEA, and community groups in such a way that will:
1. protect the most vulnerable schools that would otherwise suffer dramatic percentages of teacher layoffs;
2. distribute the remaining teacher layoffs more fairly across our public schools; and
3. be respectful of teachers and their collective bargaining rights.
This
plan might include options such as entirely rescinding the layoff
notices for the teachers at a select group of schools deemed most
academically vulnerable, creating categories of schools based on
academic performance and assigning each category a maximum percentage of
the staff which can be laid off; or rescinding the notices such that no
school has more than the district average of layoffs.
In the
future, OUSD can also provide effective teacher attraction and retention
supports at those schools that have suffered from high teacher turnover
rates and have a disproportionately high number of newer teachers, with
the goal of reducing teacher turnover at those schools. For more information:
OCO to Host Community Meeting to Discuss Budget and Layoff Crisis - Monday at 5:45
Please join parents, teachers and principals for a strategy meeting to address the impact of budget cuts and layoffs at school sites across Oakland.
The purpose of this meeting is to develop action strategies to minimize
budget cuts to school sites and prevent disproportionate impact of
teacher layoffs on schools serving the most vulnerable communities.
The meeting will be held at the OCO Offices - #2 Eastmont Mall (upper level) - on Monday, March 14th at 5:45 PM.
by Elaine Barfield, MetWest High School Sophomore and GO Public Schools Intern
"What makes you think I care about your education? Am I supposed to be worried about if you're learning and if you graduate or go to college? I know that you're the future, but do I really want to fund your school or is purchasing real estate a better investment?"
These are some of the things that I think of when I hear about budget cuts in schools. The famous cliché is, "you are the future of America", but when I hear and see what's going on, I wonder if adults are saying that, but don't really care. Their actions don't match their words.
In many schools right now, the most interesting and enjoyable programs are being removed, and being replaced with things that aren't as engaging or effective as before. When that happens, it's just showing us students what you adults think about us, like, "I want you to be intelligent, but I can't afford to pay for a quality education for you. You don't need any more art, dance, sports, or after school programs - the ones that are keeping you in school."
Many effective teachers are being removed from their jobs because of the "Last Hired, First Fired" policy. Some people may think that the last ones hired don't have much experience in teaching, and therefore are not effective. I know from experience that sometimes, they're the most effective teachers. Sometimes, it's the new teachers and not just the older ones who can connect with students and know some of what they like or they're interested in. I know exactly what it feels like to have a great teacher leave and be replaced with a poor one. It happened to me in middle school. After that experience, nothing was ever the same in school for me.
Currently I'm a sophomore student at MetWest High School in Oakland, where I can surely see the effects of budget cuts. At my school, the budget cuts have affected us in many ways. We don't have enough supplies, and if we have some, they're broken, messed up, worn out, or not up-to-date. We don't have a library, gym, cafeteria, lockers, fully functioning windows, or good food. And, to put the icing on the cake, we don't even have our own school; we share it with KDOL radio, Channel 27 TV, and a college preparedness group. As you're reading, you can see through my words some of the ways this budget crisis is affecting my education. And if nothing is done about it, it'll just get worse.
My plan, after finishing high school, is to become a pediatrician or a lawyer. Without a quality education, none of that will happen. In today's society, we need more than just a high school diploma to help us get a job. We need AAs, BAs, Masters, and Doctorate Degrees. And the budget crisis is right in the front line, blocking our path to a high quality education. If we don't do something to improve our system now, it'll affect the education of generations of young people to come. I hope people stand up for me. I hope people stand up for all the students of Oakland.
With over 85 Oakland education advocates in the room, a thought-provoking presentation from MK Think, and lots of maps and data for review, last Thursday was an opportunity for our community to come together to discuss the demographic, enrollment, and facilities data that OUSD will be using to make challenging strategic planning decisions.
As announced on Thursday, our Oakland community has two weeks to
weigh in and offer feedback to the Board of Education on approaches to
district asset allocation and right-sizing.
The presentation offers four scenarios for the board's consideration:
Efficiency - operate the fewest sites possible (larger sites offer best economies of scale)
Remove portables - eliminate portables and concentrate resources on permanent buildings
Neighborhood - align capacity with neighborhood population and minimize overlap of site coverage areas
Choice - accommodate student preference patterns
Our understanding is that two weeks from tomorrow, on March 23, the
Board will have another discussion and begin making recommendations to
staff about the direction they want to go.
What You Can Do
Attend and speak at the Board Meeting on Wednesdays March 9 and March 23 at 5pm at 1025 Second Avenue.
Contribute to the conversation on our website - offer your feedback and recommendations in the comments section below.
Send GO Public Schools your thoughts today! We'll compile them and share with the Board and the Regional Assets Task Force.
CALL TO ACTION: Become a Delegate to the OUSD Teacher Convention
SHAPE THE FUTURE OF TEACHING IN OAKLAND
On
April 7, delegates from every Oakland Unified school site will come
together at the Emeryville Hilton for Oakland's first Teacher
Convention. This is a unique opportunity for teacher voices to develop
policy to support effective practice in Oakland Unified.
Will you be there?
OUSD's Effective Teaching Task Force is
organizing this two-and-a-half day convention, where teacher leaders
will collaborate to define the priorities for a five-year strategic plan
that will address teacher evaluation, compensation, site-based
conditions, recruitment, retention, and professional development. The
convention represents an unprecedented opportunity for teachers doing
amazing work for Oakland students to set the direction for accelerating
improvement in instructional practice across our city.
TAKE ACTION: NOMINATE YOURSELF
Nominate yourself to be your school's
delegate at the April 7-9 Oakland Teacher Convention. Principals and OEA
site reps should be bringing information about the convention to a
staff meeting next week, and voting for delegates will occur a few days
later. Nominate yourself. Represent your school.
Our students are counting on you to advocate for them.
Effective teaching will be assured when...
Teachers are: provided time and
compensation for collaborating with each other and for participating in
relevant professional development; recognized, accountable, and
rewarded for their impact on student learning and achievement; and
provided opportunities for professional growth.
Teachers use multiple data
sources to assess and adjust instruction, student interventions,
professional development, and curriculum decisions.
Teachers consistently review
student work against student learning standards, and assess and adjust
teaching practice to better serve student needs.
School sites are provided with budgets, resources, training and
tools to build the capacity of their staffs, ensuring that all are
focused on high performance student outcomes and standards of work.
We have a higher base salary for teachers, as well as incentives to
retain and reward effective teachers and those who choose to teach in
high-needs communities, that is, teachers are paid more!
Teacher salaries are competitive with those of surrounding districts and communities.
Add your ideas as a delegate on April 7!
Helpful Links
Have questions about the convention? Email Ash Solar or call him at 510-879-8666.
Click here to watch the Teacher Task Force's video about the convention.
GO Public Schools believes that we must focus on
recruiting and keeping an effective teacher in every Oakland classroom.
Current studies confirm that among in-school factors, teacher
effectiveness is the single most important factor in student learning.
Further, effective teaching can close achievement gaps and overcome the
impact of poverty on student learning and educational attainment.
Click here to learn more about GO's ideas about teacher effectiveness.
Oakland Education Leaders Endorse Let Us Vote Campaign
Great Oakland Public Schools community asks Sacramento to "Let Us Vote" to preserve K-12 public school funds
Oakland, CA - February 28, 2011:
Great Oakland Public Schools and Bay Area Parent Leadership Action
Network are proudly supporting the statewide Let Us Vote! campaign. We
represent parents, teachers, principals, students and community leaders
locking arms to show support for Governor Brown's budget, including a
proposed June ballot measure that will preserve basic funding for public
schools.
Legislators and the Governor are already receiving
pressure through a flood of letters, e-mails and calls leading up to the
March 10 deadline to put the ballot measure in front of voters in June.
In the first nine days, the Let Us Vote! campaign has garnered over
13,000 email letters to legislators, with letters from all 80 assembly
districts and all 40 senate districts. Oaklanders have already sent over
700 email letters to legislators to support our schools, our children
and our future. We expect to reach 1000 letters in the next few days.
"Democrats
and Republicans in Sacramento are hearing a clear message that we need
them to move forward a proposal to preserve funding for public schools,"
said Jonathan Klein, an Oakland parent with Great Oakland Public
Schools.
California faces a $25 billion deficit and Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) faces a $30 million budget deficit
for next school year, after already cutting $122 million over the past
18 months. For the first time in this recession, OUSD plans to lay off
teachers, which will further destabilize our school communities. "Budget
cuts, to me, are an excuse for people in power to use money for other
things. When they talk about budget cuts at schools, it's like saying 'I
don't care about our educational system, I don't care about youth
learning'," stated a 10th grade student at Oakland's MetWest High
School.
The Governor's plan is to cut spending by approximately
$12.5 billion and generate another approximately $12 billion by renewing
a tax extension that is set to expire on July 1, 2011. The ballot
measure will allow Californians to vote on the tax extension. Currently,
at least 4 additional legislators need to sign on in order for the tax
extension to reach voters.
A recent poll
completed by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) indicates
that nearly 75% of Californians oppose cuts to K-12 education. Of
those, 82% are willing to pay higher taxes to fund education. According
to PPIC, between 2007-08 and 2010-11, the state's contribution to K-12
has decreased by 13 percent--and when one controls for inflation the
decrease is greater. Yet, the legislature is still arguing about putting
a revenue measure to protect school funding on the ballot.
Although
this tax extension measure won't solve fundamental school funding
issues, Oaklanders fundamentally believe that if the legislature doesn't
allow this vote to reach Californians, the legislature will be robbing
our children of the chance to have an adequate education. Without this
revenue measure, parents are expecting devastating and debilitating
changes to their children's schools.
"I've already seen the
negative impacts of budget cuts over the years. We are doing the
opposite of what needs to be done. Our schools need more money, more
resources. At my son's school, we are at risk of losing all of the
wonderful adults who support school climate and culture. How are schools
seriously expected to meet goals of providing quality education under
these conditions?" said the parent of a Westlake Middle School 6th
grader.
Great
Oakland Public Schools is a coalition of parents, educators, students
and community leaders. GO Public Schools provides leadership, education,
and information to ensure that all Oakland students have access to
excellent public schools in their neighborhood and throughout Oakland.
The
Bay Area Parent Leadership Action Network (PLAN) is a regional network
working to unite and strengthen diverse parents and organizations to
promote education justice through training, leadership development,
organizing, and advocacy.
Educate
Our State is a parent-led, statewide campaign to unite the voices of
Californians in support of high quality K-12 Public Education and demand
real change. Educate Our State represents 35,000 parents from across
California and has combined forces with the Campaign for Quality
Education, a coalition of over 20 organizations statewide.
Funding for public education in the State of California is in crisis. Governor Brown's budget for K-12 public education assumes an extension of temporary taxes for another five years. These taxes are set to expire on July 1, 2011 unless the citizens of California vote to extend them.
But, first, the state legislature has to agree to bring the vote to Californians. We need 2/3 of legislators to agree by March 10, and right now, we are still short by at least 4 legislators. We need to take immediate action.
Take Action NOW:
Send an email letter to your legislator asking him or her to "Let Us Vote!" to save public education funding.
Ask your friends and relatives across the state to send a letter to their legislator today.
Bring the "Let Us Vote!" letter (DOC here) to the next community meeting or event you attend, and ask people to take action immediately.
California voters must have the opportunity to vote to save public education funding. Let's make sure our legislatures hear our message loud and clear.
OUSD Teacher Layoffs: Why Los Angeles Matters for Oakland
For the first time during the current recession, Oakland Unified School
District (OUSD) school sites will likely have to lay off teachers. For
the past few years, school sites have protected teachers in their
budgets and enough teachers have voluntarily left OUSD to avoid layoffs.
OUSD
may lay off hundreds of teachers next year. The numbers will be less if
a tax extension measure is placed on the ballot by the state
legislature next week and is passed by California voters in June.
Teachers who might be laid off must be given notice by March 15th.
Normally,
the newest teachers are laid off first. A school site may cut a
teaching position, but District-wide seniority will decide which
teacher(s) actually get cut from the school. "Bumping" occurs when a
teacher who did not get laid off has to give up her/his position to a
teacher with higher seniority. This state policy is known as a "last-hired, first-fired" or "reverse-seniority" layoff policy.
How does what happened in Los Angeles impact Oakland? In
February 2010, students at three Los Angeles Unified School District
(LAUSD) middle schools filed a class-action lawsuit against LAUSD,
charging that students' rights to a quality education were being
violated by a strictly "last-hired, first-fired" layoff policy. The
students argued that the layoffs were unfairly damaging to their schools
because they had so many new teachers. For example, at Liechty Middle
School, 72 percent of the teachers received layoff notices last school
year. The layoffs were stopped by a Los Angeles Superior Court last May.
State law
allows for an exception to seniority-based layoffs "for purposes of
maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements
related to equal protection of the laws." The Court found LAUSD's
layoffs caused a "real and appreciable impact on Plaintiff's fundamental
right to equal education opportunity."
The settlement
reached by students, LAUSD and Partnership for Public Schools, and
approved by the LAUSD board in October 2010, requires that 45 LAUSD
"targeted schools" that meet agreed-upon criteria be shielded from
teacher layoffs. Those 45 schools will receive LAUSD support to increase
teacher and administrator attraction and retention. Also, the layoffs
that would have been at those schools will be spread out more evenly
among the rest of LAUSD's schools. The final settlement was challenged
by United Teachers of Los Angeles.
These excerpts from the Los Angeles Superior Court's Final Approval of Settlement indicate why the Court upheld the settlement against a challenge from the United Teachers of Los Angeles: "Under no circumstances can LAUSD bargain away students' constitutional rights" (p.4)
"The
evidence adduced at the final approval hearing confirms that high
teacher turnover devastates educational opportunity in multiple ways:
time and resources are spent orienting newly assigned teachers;
collaboration among teachers is disrupted; teacher-student relationships
are fractured; and the faculty infrastructure is undermined."(p.22)
"As
this Court already recognized, teacher turnover can have many causes.
Teachers may transfer to other schools, retire, or leave the profession.
But voluntary turnover cannot be prohibited; layoffs can."(p.28)
"Substantial
evidence throughout this litigation has shown how budget-based layoffs
devastated the teaching corps at struggling LAUSD schools, removing
dedicated teachers who were committed to teaching at those particular
schools."(p.29)
"Providing more stability at the
Districts' other struggling schools is therefore critical to allow for
reform efforts...the principal at Gompers [middle school] has recruited a
corps of teachers who were 'among the best teachers [she has] ever
encountered in her career'....The schools invested substantially in
teacher development. But the seniority-based layoffs decimated those
turnaround efforts. As Mr.Deasy [the incoming LAUSD superintendent]
testified, reform plans are wiped out by turnover."(p.34)
What can OUSD do? OUSD must uphold students' fundamental right to basic equality of educational opportunity.
OUSD
could comply with this state constitutional mandate to provide an equal
education to all students by working with the Oakland Education
Association to develop criteria for layoffs that protect the most
vulnerable schools that would otherwise suffer dramatic percentages of
teacher layoffs, and distribute the remaining teacher consolidations
more fairly across our public schools.
OUSD can also provide
effective teacher attraction and retention supports at those schools
that have suffered from high teacher turnover rates and have a
disproportionately high number of newer teachers, with the goal of
reducing teacher turnover at those schools.
Click here to read GO's post from June 2010 when the suit in LA was first filed on behalf of students at three LAUSD middle schools.
UPCOMING EVENT: Oakland's Changing Demographics: OUSD's Hard Decisions
How many schools does Oakland Unified need in its portfolio? How many
students should our district aim to serve? What data will be
reviewed to make these decisions?
Featuring data and analysis from partner MK Think, GO Public Schools invites you to Oakland's Changing Demographics: OUSD's Hard Decisions, a community convening to discuss the capacity, enrollment and demographic data being used for OUSD strategic planning. Click here to view a 2009 MK Think presentation that outlines the facilities and assets of OUSD.
Please join us on Thursday, March 3, from 5:30-8:00pm at the Jack London Aquatic Center to discuss these important issues. Refreshments and child care will be provided. Click here to RSVP!
Great Oakland Public Schools emphasizes community values of keeping dollars close to students, transparency about budgets, and flexibility with resources to guide the Oakland Unified School District's 2011-12 budget process.
We are a coalition of families, teachers, principals, community and nonprofit leaders joining together to support OUSD leadership to improve OUSD's initial 2011-2012 budget proposal and demand that California provide its children with quality and appropriately funded public education.
Last week, Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) leadership released their 2011-2012 budget proposal amidst the challenging economic environment here in Oakland and budget crisis statewide.
Earlier this month, Governor Brown proposed a special election in June to increase taxes in an effort to preserve education funding. If the Governor's proposal does not pass, education funding statewide will take massive hits. OUSD leadership has asked school sites to prepare two budgets - one for if the Governor's proposal passes, one for if it fails.
In the best case scenario where the tax passes, the current OUSD proposal still cuts $7.2 million in unrestricted funds from the district budget, and OUSD leadership is proposing that schools bear 100 percent of that burden. This translates to cuts of approximately $190 per student, or about $56,000 less for a school of 300 students.
In the worst case scenario where the tax does not pass, the current OUSD proposal cuts $19.1 million in unrestricted funds from the district budget, with school sites again bearing 100 percent of the cuts. This translates to approximately $500 per student or $150,000 less for a school of 300 students.
In either case, these cuts are on top of a reduction in schools' Title I allocation. Our schools serving the most vulnerable student populations may have to cut upwards of $500 or $750 per student.
As we navigate this complicated and difficult process, we urge OUSD leaders to apply these child- and school-centered values for resource allocation.
Value #1
We value preserving resources close to students and keeping cuts as far away from students as possible.
School communities city-wide are contemplating another year of very difficult decisions about increasing class sizes, combining classes, canceling academic intervention programs, decreasing teacher preps and collaboration time, etc. The proposed cuts to sites will have devastating effects on schools' instructional programs. Below are specific examples from two OUSD schools:
"We are a 250-student school with a high free-and-reduced lunch population. Because of the reductions in Title I and General Purpose (GP) funding, we have to make a $200,000 cut. Cuts in Title I are particularly brutal as they affect our most vulnerable students. Schools with the highest rates of Title I will have to make the biggest cuts. At our school, we will have to consider options like dramatically increasing class size, eliminating summer interventions, releasing a reading intervention teacher, doing away with our Reading Partners contract, removing our school-wide data coaching, removing our teacher coaches for beginning teachers, and more."
"We are 400-student school with a low free-and-reduced lunch population. We have to make a $200,000 cut. We could barely afford our base program before this cut. We have no choice but to close teacher positions and dramatically increase class size. When we raised class size last year, our school grew and it had a dramatic impact on enrollment at many nearby schools."
In addition, we know that many of the most important factors that drive teacher retention are conditions at the school site - conditions that will be adversely impacted by the proposed cuts at sites.
Value #2
The school and central office budget development process and decision-making should be transparent so that school communities can participate. We value having the information we need to contribute to good decision-making.
We request that more detailed information about how central office budget resources are being used be made public. The central office should be responsible for providing evidence of student impact to support the trade-off of cutting programs and instructional staff at school sites.
We know the central office has been cut dramatically and reorganized in recent years. We appreciate that the central office took a giant hit last year. We still believe that some cuts need be made centrally this year. School communities cannot support a budget where schools take the entire cut, especially when there has been little transparency about how the central office is using its resources.
Value #3
Funds should be used flexibly to maximize resources for students.
In this time of budget crisis, the state legislature has allowed specific restricted resources to be used without restriction. We must use this "categorical flexibility" to decrease the hit to schools and maximize the resources going to classrooms. And, if there are more flexible resources that can be sent to sites, they should be. While we understand that these are one-time monies, the purpose of these flexible monies is specifically to help districts weather the worst education funding crisis in the history of California. We should use it accordingly.
We support the Board of Education's clear priority and direction to staff to eliminate Oakland Unified's structural deficit. OUSD has made strong progress reducing expenditures while contending with extraordinary declines in state revenues.
OUSD is in the middle of a strategic planning process through which district leadership intends to "right-size" the school district, define quality schools, quality teaching, and quality leadership, and align our efforts towards those ends. Many structural changes including school closures are likely to result from this process. The hard work of restructuring the district (how many schools and where? which programs and services and where?) is the best path to eliminate the remaining structural deficit. Moving Forward
Our schools and district face immediate budget challenges. Difficult decisions will be made in the upcoming days and weeks, and we urge our community to join together around the values proposed above. Our schools and students will continue to improve if we prioritize keeping resources where they are needed most - with our students.
We ask Oakland Unified to 1) make central office department budgets public, 2) send at least $6.9 million of categorical flexibility resources to school sites, and 3) work with community to identify additional central resources that might be allocated to sites.
This June, if the Governor's proposal prevails in the legislature, our state will have an opportunity. Governor Brown's ballot measure to extend temporary taxes would provide at least an additional $12 million to Oakland public schools.
We must collaborate across schools - district and charter - and organizations to create a unified citywide coalition to ensure that Oakland is mobilized to support passing the Governor's proposal.
Check it out! OUSD launched a website dedicated to Thriving Students. It has everything you need to know about OUSD's plans to build a Full-Service Community School District.
OUSD Strategic Planning - January Update
Oakland Unified has 6 months remaining on its timeline to
complete a new 5-year strategic plan for public education in the City of
Oakland.
This
process is a powerful opportunity for community members -- parents,
students, teachers, principals, taxpayers, school and central office
employees, charter school employees and families, nonprofit, labor,
faith, elected, and business leaders -- to provide input and resources,
and build relationships to realize the aspirations of our ambitious new
strategic direction -- Community Schools, Thriving Students.
The process began in June 2010, when our Board of Education approved Thriving Students and announced 14 task forces
that will each draft chapters of a 5-year strategic plan. The
expectation is that each chapter will include 1-, 3-, and 5-year
implementation milestones for the Oakland Board of Education to
review and adopt by June 2011.
At a December retreat, the Board of Education heard 5-minute updates from each of the task force leaders about the objectives and progress of their work.
Click the images for video clips of the individual task force updates.
Effective Teaching Will make recommendations to improve the
evaluation system, hiring practices, compensation, career pathways,
and professional development for OUSD teachers.
Upcoming Event(s): January 20 from 4:30-6:30pm atCole (1011 Union Street)
African American Male Achievement Has opportunity to develop
out-of-the-box solutions and bring together resources to ensure that
African-American males thrive in Oakland.
Upcoming Event(s): January 11 from 5:00 - 7:30pm at location TBA
Quality Community Schools Development Will develop school
quality standards for all Oakland public schools and a process through
which to support and hold all schools in the portfolio accountable for
meeting the standards -- implications for closures, new school
development, turnarounds, and role of charters.
Upcoming Event(s): January 10 at 5pm at Tilden School, 4551 Steele Street
Regional Governance Will 1) make recommendations about how
local community and OUSD can share governance of schools; 2) do asset
mapping of each region and align resources and services, 3) identify
specific strategies for moving region forward
Will define the criteria by which Oakland hires, develops, and evaluates principals
Upcoming Event(s): January 25 from 4-6pm at the Tilden Campus, 4551 Steele Street, Portable D
Results Based Budgeting Will make recommendations about 1)
what decision-making authority school communities have over budgets and
spending and 2) the funding formulas for allocating resources (how much
money each school receives)
Will
answer the question of what students will need to know and be able to
do at each grade level in order to be ready for both college and careers
upon graduation.
Upcoming Event(s): January 11 at 4pm, Tilden School Auditorium (4551 Steele Street)
Financial and Operational Readiness
Will
make recommendations to eliminate OUSD's structural deficit and improve
the efficiency of OUSD operations and support systems.
Will
define what OUSD means by full service community schools (FSCS) and
full service community district. Will design a rubric for the components
of a FSCS so that schools can rate their status in becoming a FSCS and
determine where they need to work.
Upcoming Event(s): January 13 from 3:30-6:00pm at 495 Jones Street
Healthy Kids, Healthy Oakland Data
Will
develop a single-shared data system which will include academic
performance, test scores, attendance, truancy, nutrition, housing,
physical/mental health, recreation, crime/violence, etc.
Literacy Develop approach to ensuring literacy for college and career readiness pre-k to grade 12
Upcoming Event(s):January 11 at 4pm, Tilden School Auditorium (4551 Steele Street)
Secondary Experience and Achievement
Will
make recommendations to redesign the secondary experience to ensure
that all students graduate and meet the board's new policy around UC/CSU
A-G requirements.
Click here to view a 90 minute video of the presentations.
CALL TO ACTION
One
of our most deeply held values as Oaklanders is that those impacted by
decisions should be included in the decision-making. Many community
organizations and voices expressed interest in helping shape this new
strategic plan for Oakland public schools.
Over the next 6
months, it is up to each of us as parents, educators, and community
members to show up to listen, share, dialogue, and create the bright
future our children and youth deserve.
We
urge members of the GO network (particularly teachers and parents) to
consider joining and/or participating on a task force.
This is our education community's opportunity to shape the future of Oakland public schools.
Together, we can seize this moment to establish an innovative and student-centered direction for our city's public schools.
FIVE IDEAS FOR IMPACT
1) Start participating in a task force yourself - and ask one friend or colleague to join you!
2)
Bring task forces up at your School Site Council, PTA, or ELAC meeting
and ask other parents and teachers to commit to participating.
3) Send an email directly to the Task Force lead with your experiences and perspective.
5) Be positive and solution-oriented whatever you do!
RELATED CONTENT
GO statement
from June 2010 expressing support for the Board of Education's
unanimous adoption of this new direction developed with the leadership
of Superintendent Smith and asking for greater emphasis and further
discussion about the role of effective teaching and empowered school
communities within the new framework.
GO letter
from October 2010 raising questions about the pace of the work and task
force membership, composition, and participation expectations.
Blog post
about October 28 meeting when GO hosted OUSD task force leaders for
an update on the planning process and dialogue within each strategic
planning task force.
GO Public Schools would like to offer an appreciation for the lively discussion that Katy Murphy's posting of our 2011 Oakland Education Policy Wish List has prompted. The more of us that are willing to talk openly and honestly about our experiences and perspectives - the stronger the dialogue, the better the decisions, and the greater will be the outcomes for our kids.
GO Public Schools is a pro-student, pro-teacher, and pro-labor organization. Five of seven GO board members are former teachers. Two of three GO staff members have experience teaching in low-income communities and communities of color.
We remain steadfast in our belief that every student - regardless of their demographics or income level - deserves an effective, competent and passionate teacher every day of every year. But the stark reality is that we're not there yet - the evidence is in the data: the graduation rates, the drop out rates, the hated test scores, the college enrollment numbers - and we need to work together to get there.
We offer here a few points of clarification about a couple of our wish list items that have catalyzed the ongoing commentary.
The Oakland Education Association is a powerful voice and an important stakeholder in the Oakland education policy dialogue that influences decisions that extraordinarily impact students, teachers, and other employee groups. GO actively urges teachers and school sites to be sure that their voices are included in OEA's democratic processes.
Last year, there was only minimal to moderate participation from Oakland teachers in the core decision-making bodies and activities of the union.
In March 2010, only 34% of dues paying OEA members (940 out of 2,800) voted in the election for the OEA president
In January and May 2010, only 28% and 27% of dues paying OEA members (771 and 775 out of 2,800) participated in the two strike authorization votes. This means that 70% of union members were silent on both occasions.
In November 2010, only 12% of OEA members (341 out of 2,800) participated in a vote to reaffirm OEA's strike position
In addition, there is evidence of low levels of representation at the monthly OEA Site Representative Council meetings. There are 99 traditional public schools and 22 Child Development Centers in OUSD and each site may send at least 1 OEA Site Representative. Last year, the OEA Representative Council voted 43 to 12 to remain neutral on Measure L - a total of 55 votes were cast.
An example of OEA's power and the resulting consequences for public schools in Oakland can be seen in the recent Measure L ballot initiative. Measure L garnered 66 percent approval from Oakland voters, but failed to pass by about 450 votes against the measure. Despite OEA's official neutrality, members of the OEA leadership actively campaigned against Measure L - discouraging support at staff meetings, posting on blogs, and standing outside schools discouraging parents from supporting the measure.
When Measure L was defeated on November 2, every Oakland teacher (and other site-based employee) lost tens of thousands of additional dollars they would have received in increased compensation over the 10-year life of the tax.
We are grateful for the dedication, participation, and service of those individuals who currently participate in OEA. We know there are site reps chosen because they are great teachers. But serving as a site representative is too often seen as an extra duty that a member of a school team needs to accept - independent of reputation for great instructional practice or results for students.
Our wish list also raised the case of a principal who has a teacher that is not meeting the needs of her students.
Schools serving larger numbers of children who are coming to school behind or coming to school disengaged and unmotivated need very effective teachers - teachers who can close that achievement gap and accelerate their learning, can differentiate for all the levels and learning styles, and build the relationships necessary to motivate and engage some of our "falling through the cracks" youth.
This principal's struggle has to do with her need to have a school of very effective teachers to really address the needs of the student population she serves. A teacher who is perpetually mediocre will not be able to address the needs of the student population at that school. But the current system does not support this principal to remove the perpetually mediocre teacher - and our students lose precious instructional time that cannot be recaptured.
We ask a lot of our teachers, but we have to ask it. There are many wonderfully talented, dedicated, and effective teachers all over Oakland who do this work everyday. But many is not good enough for our students - all is what is required. If we don't demand it, our public education system becomes part of the larger system that perpetuates poverty and disadvantage in the same neighborhoods and in the same communities generation after generation. That is unacceptable.
GO understands that to ask this of teachers, we need to pay them more, we need to more adequately support them, we need to engage them as leaders, and provide opportunities for growth, which is why we worked so hard to get Measure L passed (in collaboration with other labor organizations) and why we push OUSD to push resources to schools and cut central budgets.
We need a clear community understanding of what Oakland means by an "effective" teacher, and tools and processes in place to ensure a great teacher for every child.
Our conversation needs to be about what is best for our children - and we need to be open-minded, listening, and learning from each other about how best to serve them.
We should not tolerate mediocrity in our public schools. Quality is everyone's responsibility and every child's right.
We would be very interested in partnering with the Oakland Education Association to help make Oakland's voice more prominently heard in Sacramento regarding adequately funding our public schools.
Thanks to everyone on the list and in the community for your work on behalf of Oakland children and youth. Here's to a great 2011!
Allison Akhnoukh, James Harris, Jonathan Klein, Sheilagh Polk, and Hae-Sin Thomas, Board of Directors, Great Oakland Public Schools
What: Join fellow Oakland educators for a welcome back celebration. You'll also get a chance to learn about the work of GO Public Schools.
When: Friday, January 7th from 4:30- 6pm
Where: Quinn's Lighthouse ~ 1951 Embarcadero East (Embarcadero Cove Marina - Oakland, CA 94606)
Free drinks for the first 10 teachers!
Oakland Education Policy Top 10 Wish List for 2011
2011 brings renewed opportunity for us to get things done for Oakland students. Here is GO's Top 10 Wish List for 2011!
Participation
from Oakland's best teachers in the Oakland Education Association's
Representative Council and March 2011 Executive Board Election.
A
Deputy Mayor for Education in Mayor Quan's office who knows the issues,
speaks for all students, and is empowered to convene and align agencies
and partners.
Wisdom within Oakland's education leadership to
ensure that Thriving Students (OUSD's new strategic direction) puts
Oakland public schools on a path to be both hubs of services and centers
of learning and high-quality teaching.
An outcomes orientation
for these final 6 months of OUSD strategic planning that sees the forest
through the trees and doesn't spend all its time and energy on process.
A
new and better answer to an Oakland principal who in a recent meeting
said that the biggest pain point within OUSD is having to retain
mediocre teachers.
Audacity and resilience among West Oakland
leaders to come together to do something different and bold on behalf of
West Oakland public schools and students.
Specificity within
Thriving Students about the positive role charter public schools play in
providing quality educational opportunities to Oakland children and
youth.
Constructive dialogue to address long-standing critiques
of Oakland's charter movement (e.g. access to special education
programs, "creaming," expulsion, etc.)
Increased vision and
emphasis on the roles of education technology and virtual learning
environments in our public schools as we endeavor to do more for our
students with fewer resources.
Generosity of spirit across
neighborhoods, communities and organizations with renewed mindfulness of
the proverb that rain does not fall on one roof alone.
In
2010, GO was an important watchdog for student-centered policy and good
governance on the Board of Education -- launching new websites and a
policy fellowship, and continuing the Board Agenda Watch which previews and reports on every board meeting.
GO
played a critical role on the YES on Measure L campaign and emerged as
an important actor on the local political scene -- providing Oaklanders
with a video voter guide
of candidates' views on education policy and demonstrating to local
candidates that student-centered positions are good politics.
In 2011, GO will continue to 1) advocate for GO's beliefs and visions
within OUSD's strategic planning process, 2) promote engagement among
Oakland teachers with OEA and OUSD decision-making, and 3) participate
in the West Oakland coalition working to change conditions and
accelerate achievement for West Oakland students.
What: A networking event for Oakland teachers to learn about GO Public Schools and meet fellow educators and education advocates
When: Friday, December 10th from 4:30-6pm
Where: Chop Bar: 247 4th Street at Alice (near Jack London Square)
Who: All Oakland education advocates are welcome to join us!
Free drinks for the first 10 teachers! Light snacks provided by Chop Bar!
Principal Leadership Dialogue Next Week
Join GO Public Schools and New Leaders for New Schools for an evening
of learning and dialogue about principal effectiveness in Oakland.
This is a chance for us - community members, principals, teachers,
parents - to come together to consider how the district can ensure an
effective leader in every Oakland public school.
Location: Jack London Aquatic Center, 115 Embarcadero, Oakland, CA 94606 When: Wednesday, December 8, 5:30 - 8:00PM
Agenda 5:30 - Networking and refreshments 6:00 - Program (Details below)
Gia Truong,
Executive Officer of Leadership, Curriculum, and Instruction in OUSD
and participant in the New Leaders for New Schools program will open
the evening with an overview of the work and impact of New Leaders for
New Schools (NLNS) in Oakland.
Next, Matt Kelemen
of NLNS will present highlights from Evaluating Principals, a recent
white paper released by the organization, highlighting ideas for the
design and implementation of evaluation systems to increase principal
effectiveness.
A panel of Oakland education
stakeholders, including principals, teachers, and parents, will respond
to the ideas presented, considering how the research applies to
Oakland's public schools. Panelists include Jerome Gourdine, Principal of Frick Middle School, Monica Thomas, Principal of Greenleaf Elementary, Enikia Ford-Morthel, Principal of Cox Academy, Karen Pezzetti, teacher at Life Academy, and Emma Paulino, Oakland parent and OCO lead organizer.
Finally, you will
have the opportunity to break into small groups to reflect on, discuss,
and provide input to the Oakland community on the topics of the
evening.
It's a busy month for OUSD strategic planning task forces, and the
community is invited to participate in all meetings! Click on the links
below to find out the time and location for each of these upcoming task
force meetings, and click here for a complete calendar and task force overview.
Much of the content of the GO website is now available in Spanish! Click here to access our Spanish language site.
Google translate can be used to translate our website into many other languages. Click any of the language links at the bottom of the home page to get started!
What do election results mean for Oakland Public Schools?
From local government to Capitol Hill, new leaders elected on November 2 could influence improvement for Oakland's students. What do these leaders have planned for our schools?
Mayor Jean Quan, a former school board member, plans to strengthen volunteer recruitment, programs for disconnected youth, and primary school literacy rates.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson is emphasizing school funding, neighborhood schools, charter school accountability, wraparound services and 21st Century schools.
California's Governor Jerry Brown brings a long and deep history with public schools and higher education. He plans to reform education funding, testing, teacher recruitment and training, increase local control, improve curriculum, and emphasize technology. He will have to grapple with a budget crisis and restrictive voter mandates.
Republicans regaining control of the US Congress means the No Child Left Behind (ESEA) re-authorization could be shelved, rewritten to emphasize reforms, or reworked to diminish the role of the federal government. The Race to the Top grant competition, funded with stimulus dollars, will play some role in future political deal-making.
On October 28, over 115 Oakland education advocates came together to participate in a strategic planning workshop with OUSD's task force
leaders. The room was filled with diverse perspectives, experiences,
and expertise, and the GO network was offered a tremendous opportunity.
OUSD leaders published dates, times, and locations for all upcoming task
force meetings, and extended an invitation to the community to engage
in building the district's strategic plan together.
This is the
opportunity we've been asking for - OUSD leadership opened up the
strategic planning process to the Oakland community. Our voices will
contribute to the rich conversations and decisions that will shape the
new strategic plan.
Vernon
Hal, OUSD's Chief Financial Officer, shared with the GO community that
the district's strategic plan includes ten strategic initiatives
(comprised of 14 task forces), divided into two big buckets:
High Quality Effective Instruction
Readying the Organization to become a Full Service Community District
Community Engagement
While
each of the 14 task forces has a different process, timeline, and work
plan that corresponds with its group's goals and deliverables, Mr. Hal
explained that there are a variety of ways people can get involved with
the process of turning the strategic vision into reality.
What you can do: Attend a task force meeting. All dates, times, and locations are published on OUSD's calendar, with the upcoming meetings as follows:
November 1, 6:30pm - Quality Schools Development Group
November 4, 2:00pm - Secondary Experience and Achievement (SEAN)
November 4, 3:30pm - Full Service Community Schools Task Force
November 4, 4:30pm - Teacher Effectiveness Task Force Task Force
On September 17th, Great Oakland Public Schools members interviewed all four Oakland School Board candidates. District 4 (Montclair/Laurel/Dimond) is our only competitive school board race, with incumbent Gary Yee challenged by Ben Visnick. District 2 incumbent David Kakishiba and District 6 incumbent Chris Dobbins are running unopposed.
What kind of leadership can we expect from the next school board? GO filmed an opening statement from each school board candidate, and then asked questions about solutions and strategies for public education in Oakland. Each candidate had lots of ideas to share. Here are just a few quotations:
Words shared by Gary Yee
Teacher retention
"Teachers tend to be retained if they have a sense of professional efficacy, that means that the work they put in makes a difference, they have a social network in the school with instructional leadership, and they are connected to the community."
"One of the things that I have been talking to many people in union leadership about is developing a career ladder so teachers who are working and serving effectively in high turnover schools can maybe have a position as a senior teacher to provide a curriculum and pedagogical anchor in the school."
Effective teachers
"I was a principal so I know what it means to have effective teachers and ineffective teachers. We need to have a system that does both - that retains effective teachers and persuades people for whom teaching is not the right profession, to move on to another profession."
Words shared by Ben Visnick
School Board/Superintendent relationship
"This school board needs a critical voice. If you watch school board meetings, often the votes are 7 to 0. And somehow the board thinks, you know, we have a new Superintendent, and he is like superman, no pun intended, and we need to have a critical voice."
"Right size" for the school district
"I also am calling for a more efficient use of our resources. One of my ideas is to merge the Emeryville and the Piedmont School Districts into a greater Oakland Unified School District. Particularly, merging Emery High School with McClymonds makes a lot of sense in the West Oakland area."
Teacher compensation
"I'm not for merit pay, but if we ever do get merit pay, I think it should first be for middle school teachers."
Words shared by David Kakishiba (District 4)
Teacher retention
"As a school district, we have to move towards more of a teacher-leader framework for driving and leading teacher training, professional development, supporting brand new teachers, being able to have teachers play a big role individually and in teams at schools."
OUSD/City partnership
"For too long there has been a tremendous waste of time engaging politicians in trying to do strong, effective collaboration [between OUSD and City Hall]."
Words shared by Chris Dobbins (District 6)
OUSD/City partnerships
"A lot of times we talk to city council people, they want to use the schools, you know, the school sites themselves for actual functions and things like that, which is nice, and we want to do that, but we also want to have that reciprocity with us, with our schools being able to use parks, being able to use other facilities, city buildings."
School leadership
"We challenge our principals, I think, a lot more in Oakland because of the results-based budgeting process. They have to be almost CEOs, if you will, if you want to look at it in a business context. So in order to have strong teachers you want to have effective leaders as well."
There are just five, yes five, days until Election Day. Thanks to a great deal of volunteer support, the Yes on L campaign is charging ahead. But, we can't stop just yet. To pass Measure L, we must make sure that every Yes on L supporter casts his or her vote on November 2.
Get Out the Vote (GOTV) activities help not only to persuade voters to support Yes on L, but also remind supporters to vote in this year's election.
Friday, October 29 - Tuesday, November 2 (Election Day) we're asking all supporters to help with one last big push to pass Measure L! Here are some great volunteer opportunities. To sign up or for more information email jasmine@gopublicschools.org or call 510-868-8800
Friday, October 29
Distribute GOTV flyers to families at targeted school locations, 7:30 - 9:00am or 2:30 - 4:00pm (locations TBA)
Distribute GOTV flyers at the Montclair Halloween Parade, 3:15pm at Bank of America, 496 Lake Park Avenue
Saturday, October 30
Table and distribute GOTV flyers at Grand Lake Farmer's Market
Distribute GOTV flyers at Lakeshore Annual Halloween Parade & Fall Festival, 11:00am, Lakeshore Baptist Church, 3534 Lakeshore Avenue
Distribute GOTV flyers at Trick or Treat in the Laurel, 12:00 - 2:00pm, on MacArthur Blvd. between the corners of 35th Avenue and High Street.
Distribute GOTV flyers at The Haunted Hallway at Piedmont Avenue Elementary School, 11:00am - 2:00pm, 4314 Piedmont Avenue
Sunday, October 31
Distribute GOTV Flyers at the Children's Halloween Parade Rockridge, 12:00pm, 5951 College Avenue
Table and distribute GOTV flyers at the Montclair Farmers Market
Distribute GOTV flyers at local churches
Monday, November 1
Distribute GOTV flyers to families at targeted school locations (locations TBA)
Plans
include the development of strategic task forces to support the creation of a
full service community district that serves the whole child, eliminates
inequity, and provides each child with an excellent teacher every day.
It
is critical that parents and teachers are represented on every task
force. GO Public Schools shared a letter
with OUSD leaders expressing concerns about the lack of community
involvement in the strategic planning process so far, and has invited
district and task force leaders to a community meeting on Thursday,
October 28th to share the objectives, work plans, and opportunities for
community engagement.
Click on the links below to learn more about each of the task force's goals, deliverables, leadership, process, and time line.
GO members interviewed
all four school board candidates to find out their plans for improving
public education in Oakland. Click each candidate's image to view a
different segment of the interview.
There are four school board candidates vying for three seats:
ALERT: GO Launches Vote for Oakland Students: Video Education Voter Guide
GREAT OAKLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS MEMBERS INTERVIEW OAKLAND'S MAYORAL CANDIDATES ABOUT EDUCATION Candidates share plans to retain great teachers, partner with the school district, and advocate for students
On November 2, Oakland voters will elect a new mayor. While crime and economic development often grab the headlines, foundation for a prosperous future and the solution to many of our challenges lie within our public schools. Over the course of two Monday nights (September 13th and 20th), members of Great Oakland Public Schools interviewed all ten mayoral candidates at KDOL Studios about public education in Oakland. The Vote for Oakland: Video Education Voter Guide is being shared on the GO website so that any Oakland voter can see and hear what candidates intend to do for Oakland schools and students.
Many candidates acknowledged that improving our public schools and educating our youth are the most important items we need to tackle as a City. The candidates' level of expertise and education ideas were wide-ranging. Many Oakland families, teachers, and community leaders expect to see much stronger efforts from City Hall and the School District to work together than what they have seen in the past.
After candidates made their opening statement about their education platforms, GO members asked three questions:
What will you do to attract and retain great teachers in every Oakland public school?
OUSD's new strategic vision, Thriving Students, requires tremendous collaboration and partnership between OUSD and City Hall, including on facilities, health, safety, and more. How would you have City Hall partner with the school district to serve our students?
How do you envision the Mayor's role as an advocate for our students?
Oakland mayors have had an assortment of ways of working for better public schools. Mayor Elihu Harris convened an "Education Cabinet" for several years, Mayor Jerry Brown got voter approval to appoint three people to the school board (the measure expired in 2004), and Mayor Ron Dellums has a senior education advisor on his staff. Mayors across the United States are attempting to improve education outcomes through advocacy, better management, and bringing community assets to schools.
The Vote for Oakland: Video Education Voter Guide is posted along with extensive candidate questionnaires and general information on the elections and voting. In addition, DVDs of the interviews have been distributed to hundreds of Oakland education stakeholders, including principals, teachers, and community members. Recipients are encouraged to host a house party or other viewing forum to talk about the upcoming election and the importance of Mayoral platforms on public education. For those interested in obtaining a copy of the DVD, GO Public Schools will make every effort to accommodate requests. Please email us at info@gopublicschools.org to request a copy.
Over 100 advocates for public education in the City of Oakland came together this morning at the Yes on L Campaign Kick-off at Sequoia Elementary School. In addition to parents, students, teachers, and principals from across the City, School Board Directors London, Yee, Kakishiba, and Dobbins represented OUSD alongside Superintendent Tony Smith. The enthusiasm in the room was palpable as Superintendent Smith rallied
the crowd around the need to support excellent
teachers in Oakland's public schools.
A wide range of community organizations attended the rally, demonstrating a strong, diverse show of support for Measure L and Oakland's public schools. In attendance were representatives from EBAYC, Oakland Schools Foundation, GO Public Schools, West Oakland Education Brain Trust, Oakland Community Organizations, Faith Network, Oakland Parents Together, California Charter Schools Association, UAOS, and more!
Oaklanders across the city are coming together for YES on L: The Oakland Student Achievement, Safety, and Support Measure.
Massive state budget cuts, reduced federal funding, and a sluggish
economy forced OUSD to slash $122 million from our 2010-11 budget. The
District has already laid off more than 600 people, including teachers,
aides, librarians, custodians, school nurses and security staff. These
types of devastating cuts simply cannot continue.
YES on L helps Oakland schools retain experienced, effective teachers by paying competitive salaries.
YES on L
provides ALL Oakland schools additional funding - not just a select few
- so that ALL of our schools, including those who need it the most -
have resources and support staff to meet children's essential social,
emotional and academic needs.
Measure L benefits all school site employees and includes exemptions
for low-income taxpayers and fiscal accountability provisions such as
requiring review by a Citizens' Oversight Committee, public expenditure
reports, and guaranteed annual independent audits.
Please keep reading and take 5 minutes to support "Yes on L" right now.
Si, se puede.
Jonathan
#1 ADD YOUR NAME TO THE LIST OF SUPPORTERS
Click here to add your name
to the growing list (see below) of Oakland leaders and citizens who are
joining together to provide an additional $20 million for Oakland
public schools for each of the next 10 years.
#2 DISTRIBUTE INFORMATION AT YOUR SCHOOL SITE
OUSD and charter public school employees are permitted and encouraged to distribute informational
materials about Measure L within your school communities -- at
Back-to-School nights, PTA, SSC, and ELAC meetings, through home-school
folders, and via other opportunities.
OUSD employees are not permitted to engage
in advocacy on behalf of ballot measures while at work, so the language
in these documents is meant to be informative rather than persuasive in
nature.
Click here to make a donation to YES on L. YES on L needs your support to ensure it has the financial resources to reach Oakland voters between now and election day.
Elected Officials Sheila Jordan, Alameda County Superintendent Gary Yee, OUSD Board President David Kakishiba, OUSD Board Member Jody London, OUSD Board Member Alice Spearman, OUSD Board Member Chris Dobbins, OUSD Board Vice President Jumoke Hinton-Hodge, OUSD Board Member Pat Kernighan, Oakland City Council Larry Reid, Oakland City Council Jean Quan, Oakland City Council Ken Rice, OUSD Board Member (ret) Kerry Hamill, OUSD Board Member (ret) Nicky Yuen, Peralta CCD Board Trustee
Community Organizations Alameda County Democratic Party Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club Oakland League of Women Voters Oakland Community Organizations Great Oakland Public Schools East Bay Asian Youth Center Bret Harte Middle School PTA
Education and Community Leaders Dr. Robert W. Blackburn, Former OUSD Superintendent Dr. Ruth B. Love, Former OUSD Superintendent Henry Hitz, Oakland Parents Together Joanna Lougin, Former OUSD Principal Morris Tatum, Head Custodian, Oakland High School Sally Barry, PTA Vice-President, Chabot Elementary Jesse Phelps, PTO Co-President, Emerson Elementary Mike Fee, PTA President, Joaquin Miller Elementary Celia Davis, PTA President, Bret Harte Middle School Karen Pezetti, Former OUSD Teacher of the Year Anthony Cody Caleb Cheung Susan Audap Hae-Sin Thomas Jean Driscoll Judy Schwartz, Parent, Oakland Technical High School Meg Stewart, Resource Specialist, Bret Harte Middle School Brian Rogers Dagmar Serota Donn Harris, Executive Director, Oakland School for the Arts Ron Strochlic, Parent, Glenview Elementary Erin Kollings, Teacher, Futures Elementary Paulette Drawsand, Attendance Clerk, OUSD Deanita Lewis, Parent Coordinator, Coliseum College Prep Academy Peter Fiske, Parent, Chabot Elementary Jessica Stewart, Former Teacher, Elmhurst Community Prep Middle School Bruce Buckelew, Oakland Technology Exchange West Bob Spencer, Board Chair, National Equity Project Amy Boyle, Teacher, Coliseum College Prep Academy Erica Favela, Teacher, Greenleaf Elementary Juliana Houston, Teacher, Westlake Middle School James Barton, Teacher, Berkley Maynard Academy Emily Sacks, Resource Specialist, Redwood Heights Elementary Michael Alston, Teacher, Montera Middle School Liz Sullivan, Oakland Community Organizations Mark and Karen Bloom, Parents, Joaquin Miller Elementary School Suzanne Loosen, Oakland League of Women Voters Yuri Vasquez, 2010 Valedictorian, Mandela High School Michele Clark, Executive Director, Youth Employment Partnership Gianna Tran, Deputy Executive Director, East Bay Asian Youth Center
This is a partial list of YES on L
endorsements. YES on L enjoys the support of hundreds of Oakland
citizens from all walks of life. Organizations are included for
identification purposes only.
Now is the time! Show your support for Measure L, OUSD's parcel tax
On November 2, Oaklanders will vote on Measure L, The Student Achievement, Support and Safety Measure.
If it receives the two-thirds vote needed to pass, Measure L will generate $20 million annually for ten years to
increase compensation for Oakland's teachers, student support staff,
and school-site health and safety personnel.
Why is this so important?
55% of Oakland teachers leave after three years
Oakland loses more than 14% of its teaching force annually
Average
teacher salaries in Oakland rank at or near the bottom when compared to
other districts locally and throughout California
The average Oakland teacher can earn $10,000 more simply by transferring to a neighboring district
Why now?
Oakland Unified has already cut $122 million from the budget, including more than 600 personnel positions
7
out of 10 Oakland voters agree that the district simply does not have
the resources to increase teacher salaries (June 2010 Poll Results)
Facts about Measure L:
Yes on L helps ALL Oakland schools with additional funding.
Money
from Measure L will go directly into compensation for effective
teachers and staff, bringing Oakland on par with neighboring school
districts, allowing us to help keep excellent Oakland teachers
in Oakland schools.
Measure
L priorities help ensure every school has adequate student
support staff, including teachers' aides, safety officers, and
custodians.
About the Fellowship GO Public Schools offers education
advocates the opportunity to research and impact local policy decisions
as related to public education in the City of Oakland. We are seeking
fellows to focus on the each of the Oakland Unified School District's
board committees: teaching and learning, intergovernmental relations,
facilities, safety, and finance and human resources. Fellows will gain
practical experience in research and writing, policy advocacy, and
educational outreach.
Policy fellows will:
Review
agendas, attend meetings, and highlight decisions of Oakland Unified
School District Board of Education meetings, including committee
meetings; draft blog posts for GO website; represent GO Public Schools
at meetings; engage with Board members as needed
Provide in-depth policy analysis and reporting on local and federal education policy issues as they relate to GO Public Schools
Advocate around GO's positions and strategies for improvement
Draft, edit, and finalize press releases, policy and endorsement letters, board memos, and talking points
Support GO's overall policy positions and advocacy strategies for advancing the organization's mission
Benefits:
Opportunity to impact public education policy in Oakland
Be part of a dynamic team of educators and education advocates
Gain practical research, writing, and advocacy skills
Opportunity to interact with elected and appointed district officials
Qualifications Required The
ideal candidate will be a self-starter with strong project management
and communication skills. This individual will support our policy
research and analysis.
Qualifications include:
Understanding of and/or willingness to learn about Oakland and Oakland Unified School District stakeholders
Strong and strategic written and verbal communication skills, with a willingness to engage in public speaking
Flexibility
and transportation to attend Board of Education committee and/or
regular meetings as assigned (Note: some Board committees meet during
the day, while others meet in the evenings. Fellows must commit to
attending a strand of meetings).
Commitment for full semester (September 2010 - January 2011) with opportunity to extend through June 2011
This is a part-time fellowship, which will involve some travel around Oakland.
All
applicants should submit a cover letter, resume, and writing sample to
Erika Abelon, Managing Director, via email: erika@gopublicschools.org.
Please include the reference "Policy Fellowship" in the subject line. Deadline to apply: September 3, 2010.
Who is Running for Oakland School Board This November?
District 2 - David Kakishiba (running unopposed) David
Kakishiba (incumbent) is the Executive Director of the East Bay Asian
Youth Center (EBAYC) and is also a life- long living advocate for
students. He was one of the founders of several youth organizations
including Oakland Kids First, Youth Together, and Youth Sounds.
District 4 - Gary Yee, Ben Visnick Gary
Yee (incumbent) has been a resident of Oakland for many years and has
been an educator for over thirty years. He began his career in public
education in 1973 as a third grade teacher at Cleveland Elementary
School, directing the district's Gifted and Talented Education Program
(1983-85), serving as assistant principal at Franklin Year Round School
and Principal at Hillcrest School (1985-90), and Assistant to the
Superintendent (1992-1995). He graduated from Castlemont High School,
the University of California at Berkeley, California State University at
Hayward (Teaching Credential and Masters in Public Administration), and
Stanford University.
Ben Visnick is a Social Studies teacher at
Oakland Senior High School. He received his BA in History from Brandeis
University, his teaching credential from Temple University, and his MA
in American History from San Francisco State University. District 6 - Christopher Dobbins (running unopposed) Christopher
Dobbins (incumbent) attended and graduated from Carl B. Munck
Elementary School, Montera Junior High School, and Skyline High School. He has a B.A. in Urban Planning from U.C. Berkeley, a Single-Subject
teaching credential in Social Studies from California State University, a
Masters in Public Administration from California State University, and
a JD and a Masters of Business Administration from San Francisco State
University.
Stay tuned to GO Public Schools to hear from these candidates.
Teacher Parcel Tax - How it can ensure effective teaching in every classroom, every day
GO Public Schools applauds the Oakland Unified School District's Board of Education for taking leadership to increase the salaries of our teachers and other school staff, and in particular, focusing the parcel tax to "retain effective and skilled teaching staff to improve student achievement, and to fund teacher development to improve teacher performance." GO Public Schools continues to advocate that an effective teacher in every classroom is the single most important in-school factor determining student achievement.
The proposed parcel tax measure would raise $20 million for the Oakland Unified School District, providing an approximate 6% raise to teachers, student support staff, and school-site health and safety staff. To learn more about the provisions in the measure, please click here.
In order to ensure that the collected parcel tax funds actually increase student achievement, GO Public Schools would ask the Board to commit to not spending any Oakland taxpayer dollars until the Board adopts a definition of effective teaching, a clear system for measuring effectiveness, and a system for supporting teachers who do not meet this standard of effectiveness. GO believes that this commitment would support the District in its stated goal of having an effective teacher in every classroom, every day. Without this commitment, GO does not believe that the district will be able to truly correlate the use of tax dollars with teacher effectiveness and increased student performance.
Therefore, GO Public Schools respectfully asks that in addition to placing the parcel tax on the ballot, the OUSD Board of Education passes a Resolution stating that any funds collected from the parcel tax cannot be used until a clear definition of effective teaching and an evaluative system for measuring teacher effectiveness are adopted by the Board. We believe that by passing this Resolution, the Board will be holding itself accountable to its own strategic priorities and the taxpayers of Oakland.
In addition, the proposed ballot measure does not address teacher recruitment. While increased salaries will help with teacher recruitment in Oakland, it will not, by itself, ensure an effective teacher in every classroom. We ask that the issue of recruiting quality teachers be addressed by the Board as part of this measure, or in some other clear manner. Our teacher workforce is facing a large wave of retirements in the next few years; this parcel tax presents an opportunity to help Oakland attract the teaching force our children deserve.
We understand this parcel tax is just one tool to ensure an effective teacher in every classroom, and we ask that the Board make the most of this unique opportunity for voters to support improved public schools in Oakland.
The Board of Education will be holding a special meeting tomorrow at 8pm at 1025 Second Avenue to discuss this parcel tax measure, and will vote on whether to place it on the November ballot. Join them to share your thoughts!
GO Hosts Speaker Series: The Roles and Responsibilities of the Oakland School Board
Last night, nearly 100 Oakland education advocates gathered for GO's Elections Season Kick-Off, co-hosted by the League of Women Voters of Oakland. In attendance were educators, parents, school/district staff, Board members, community members, and education advocates from across the City. After guests had a brief opportunity to network with one another around their interest in and support for public education in Oakland, the GO Public Schools team welcomed the group and provided updates on important organizational developments and current issue campaigns.
Chris Maricle, from the California School Boards Association, delivered the keynote address on the Roles and Responsibilities of the Oakland School Board. Mr. Maricle discussed the basics of school governance structures, the ways in which school boards exercise their leadership, and the role of the public in electing and influencing the school board's priorities and activities. He shared that the Board has five key responsibilities - to provide direction, structure, support, accountability, and community advocacy and support to ensure a high functioning, high quality public school district. He also spoke of the attributes of effective board members: preparation, focus, mindfulness, and manner. While we elect individuals to the board, and individual board members have influence over their colleagues, the board makes decisions as a unified body. Where does the public fit into all of this? The community's role includes participating in the election process, attending meetings, and offering to help.
After the presentation, participants broke into small groups to discuss their reactions and begin brainstorming next steps. Notes from these sessions will be posted soon!
Participants left the event inspired to engage more meaningfully with school board members and make informed choices when voting for school board candidates this November. Great Oakland Public Schools is excited about the momentum coming out of the event, and is committed to being a source for relevant, quality information about the 2010 November elections! GO Public Schools is YOUR 2010 election connection!
Questions to ask your candidates for SCHOOL BOARD, CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR: 1) All candidates say they stand for good education in our schools. What specifically would you contribute to a quality education for every child in Oakland?
2) What will you do to attract and retain great teachers in every Oakland public schools?
3) What role should charter schools play for students and families in Oakland?
4) Next fiscal year the City faces a $42 millions shortfall and the school district faces a $122 million shortfall. How do you envision these two agencies work together during these hard times?
5) President Obama created the largest single Federal investment in education in history. How will you ensure Oakland students benefit from this funding?
6) What will you do to support OUSD's new Strategic plan?
7) In what specific ways will you work with OUSD Superintendent Smith and Police Chief Batts to keep our children safe?
8) What State- level practices and policies hold back the quality of our public schools and what are your plans to change them?
9) The current public school system is financially unsustainable and does not produce equitable and excellent outcomes for all students. What are your ideas for the public school system of tomorrow?
10) Where do you turn for information and ideas about how to improve Oakland public schools?
GO Public Schools and The League of Women Voters of Oakland present:
The Roles and Responsibilities of the Oakland School Board
with Chris Maricle, California School Boards Association
Wednesday July 21 5:30pm-8pm Jack London Aquatic Center 115 Embarcadero, Oakland
* Learn what the Oakland school board's job is, and what a great school board looks like * Learn how to engage the school board and superintendent * Network with other Oakland leaders and education advocates * Learn about Oakland school board elections this year
Who should attend: Teachers * Public School Employees * Parents * School Board Members * City Leaders * Candidates * Advocates * Students
Ice cream social and refreshments begin at 5:30! Free parking Child care available upon request RSVP Today!
Great Oakland Public Schools Information Center provides leadership, education, and information to ensure that all Oakland students have access to excellent public schools in their neighborhood and throughout the city. The League of Women Voters is an organization of women and men doing the hands-on work to safeguard democracy. The League is a diverse, non-partisan, political group with a long-standing tradition of educating voters.
VOTE on NOVEMBER 2nd for: MAYOR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS 2, 4, and 6 SCHOOL BOARD DISTRICTS 2, 4, and 6
Elections Kick-Off!
GO Public Schools and The League of Women Voters of Oakland present: The
Roles and Responsibilities of the Oakland School Board, with Chris
Maricle of the California School Boards Association.
Board of Education Strategic Retreat #4 June 19, 2010
On
Saturday, the Board of Education unanimously approved the strategic
direction for the Oakland Unified School District proposed by
Superintendent Smith and his leadership team.
GO Public Schools
members in attendance were excited to hear and see our city's education
leadership coming together around a clear direction and vision to
support Oakland's children.
While enormous fiscal, human
resource, and political challenges lie ahead, our hope is that
Oaklanders will stretch across lines of neighborhood, race,
income-level, charter and district roles to come together in support of
the Superintendent's objectives to better serve our students.
Over
the next year, the district will convene 10 task forces to support the
development of a five-year strategic plan to advance improvement in our
public schools. By working together, Oakland will become a place of
connection, care, and excellence for all of our young people.
This past Saturday afternoon, at the OUSD district office at 1025 2nd
Avenue, Oakland was on the move.
While it will take time to
digest and understand the depth and breadth of OUSD's new strategic
direction, the following are initial thoughts on the Thriving
Students Framework:
Areas of alignment with GO Beliefs
and Vision
Puts Children First OUSD's Thriving
Students Framework states that "educators, parents, and community
partners ask themselves continuously how decisions, strategies,
resources, and innovations will impact all OUSD children and in
particular those who have been underserved." This aligns with GO's value
that "above any other priority, stakeholder, or policy, our school
system's top priority must be to increase student learning and
achievement."
Equity GO seeks equitable opportunity,
resources, and outcomes for students of all backgrounds and
neighborhoods. Thriving Students' emphasis on African-American
male achievement and needs-based resource allocation has high potential
to move our public schools closer to these goals. We expect the work of
these initiatives to be broadly applicable to all undeserved/
underachieving groups.
One Oakland GO's Beliefs and
Visions are clear: "It takes a village to raise a child, and Oakland is a
robust and strong village that is being underutilized. We must commit
to work together to create strong and purposeful partnerships for
positive change and improvement."
On Saturday, Superintendent
Smith commented; "We have a linked fate, our city has to come together
in support of our children and youth. OUSD will be the platform to
organize the dialogue to unify Oakland for the academic and social
success of our children. We must acknowledge that what we've been doing
is completely inadequate; that we need to do something radically
different to get fundamentally different outcomes for our children." GO
could not agree more strongly.
Quality, Neighborhood Options The
proposed "Quality Community Schools Development Group" has the
potential to support, hold accountable, and incubate innovative programs
in alignment with GO's belief that families in every neighborhood
should have quality choices about where to send their children to
school. Thriving Students supports GO's vision that "Oakland
should become a student-outcomes oriented center for innovation and
achievement in education."
Areas of GO Beliefs and Vision
that require more emphasis and discussion
Effective
Teaching GO supports Directors Gallo and Kakishiba's comments and
questions about how the plan will ensure that OUSD has an effective
teacher in every classroom. We agree with Director Gallo that OUSD needs
to make changes to increase and differentiate support for teachers, to
redesign the evaluation system to include evidence of student learning,
and to increase compensation to attract and retain the best teachers for
our students.
GO calls on OUSD leadership, in partnership with
community and educators, to continue to explore the implications of the
evidence that, among in-school factors, teacher effectiveness is the
single most important factor in student learning.
Empowered
School Communities GO believes that families, teachers,
principals, and students have the responsibility of making site- and
community-based decisions to improve student outcomes.
GO will
work with the Superintendent and Board of Education to continue to move
the system toward increasing school site autonomy and flexibility
regarding four key areas: 1. People: Hiring, dismissal, job/role
structures, compensation etc. 2. Time: Schedule and calendar 3.
Program: Curricular and programmatic diversity 4. Money: Agility
with resources to meet changing and local needs
While the Thriving
Students framework calls for dramatic change, it is not clear how
far leaders are willing to push to change existing constraints within
education code, district policy, and collective bargaining agreements to
improve conditions for schools and students.
What you can
expect from GO
GO will continue to help Oaklanders
understand and act upon the direction set forth in the Thriving
Students framework. As we understand the task force process, we will
invite and encourage the GO network to participate.
GO will also
continue to share and access the promising education ideas, strategies,
and practices from within Oakland and around the nation through our
online community and events.
Upcoming blog posts will focus on
building our understanding of "full service community schools" and the
efforts of other cities to improve teacher effectiveness through
innovative changes to evaluation, compensation, and support practices.
GO
will also invite Superintendent Smith for discussion in August about
the Thriving Students framework, to learn more about how OUSD
plans to partner with community on implementing this new direction, and
how our network can participate in the task forces to develop the 5-year
strategic plan.
GO will share comments submitted online from our
network with the Board of Education and Superintendent.
Click
below to add your comments on the new strategic direction: What are the
plan's strengths? What weaknesses do you see? What questions do you
have?
On Saturday, the Board of Education discussed the status of efforts to develop a parcel tax to ensure that Oakland can attract and retain the best teachers for our students.
Over the next couple weeks, Director Kakishiba will work with a firm to poll the community about the potential measure and the Board decided to schedule a special meeting after the July Fourth holiday to consider the results.
The documentation to place the measure on the November 2010 ballot must be filed by August 6.
If it decides to move forward, the Board will likely meet again later in July to come to agreement about what specifically they're going to ask the voters to support.
Parcel Tax Benefits
From our understanding of the discussion, a successful measure will do four things:
Increase compensation for teachers to be competitive with other local districts
Include incentives for hard to staff subject areas and high need schools
Benefit students and teachers at both district and charter public schools, ideally pegged to the percentage of Oakland students in both schools
Increase compensation for all school employees
Our hope is that the Board is polling about scenarios that meet all of these criteria.
Oaklanders will be less in interested in just improving teacher compensation.
Ultimately, we want to be sure that the measure "solves the problem" and makes us competitive to attract and retain the best teachers for our children.
How You Can Help
City and education leaders need to hear from community that we want to prioritize our children, teachers, and schools.
City and education leaders need to coordinate a shared approach to November ballot measures so that we can support our students and teachers while sustaining other essential city services.
Add your name to our petition in support of the parcel tax. Urge school board members to let Oakland voters decide whether they want to pay our teachers more. The board should not stand in the way of Oaklanders having the opportunity to vote!
Call or email our elected city and school district leaders urging them to collaborate and get this done for our children.
Tomorrow afternoon, Oakland education advocates have a critical opportunity to learn about the Board of Education and Superintendent's vision for improving our public schools and the strategic direction for OUSD.
In particular, GO members will learn more about how OUSD's strategic direction aligns with our six focus areas:
In addition, the
Board will discuss "whether a parcel tax election shall be called for
November 2010 General Election Ballot to support the educational mission of the
District."
It is critical that our network understands the Board and Superintendent's plans as we set priorities for our advocacy and work in the coming year.
OUSD posted five key documents to support tomorrow's discussion:
2) Building the Plan Together Part I:
A one page "at-a-glance" overview of the 10 strategic areas for work and
discussion during the 2010-2011 strategic planning year.
3) Building the Plan Together Part II: An eleven page overview of the proposed planning process, community engagement, workplans and outcomes for the 2010-2011 year.
4) Building the Plan Together Part III:
A proposal to create task forces to lead the work within each strategic
area with questions for board feedback during tomorrow's discussion.
5) Thriving Students:
A 57-page narrative further detailing the strategic direction, theory
of action, and plans to ready OUSD to become a full-service community
district.
The
retreat is scheduled for 1-4pm tomorrow in the board room at 1025 2nd
Avenue.
GO Public Schools urges community to attend and participate in
support of a student-centered, innovative plan for our public schools.
Teacher Parcel Tax Petition - SIGN TODAY!
Oakland education advocates must come together NOW to encourage our school board to place the teacher parcel tax on the November ballot.
The only way we can increase teacher salaries without cutting more
jobs is a parcel tax.
Oaklanders should get to decide if they want our teachers to be paid
more.
A $25 million parcel tax could translate into a 5 percent raise for all public
school teachers in Oakland, with 80 percent of funds raised supporting
district public school teachers and support staff.
A parcel tax is the single largest, most immediate, and least
controversial source of revenue that can be applied to employee
compensation.
Let the Board of Education know that you
support a local parcel tax to increase teacher compensation. OAKLAND TEACHERS AND STUDENTS DESERVE BETTER!
Oakland Teachers Deserve To Be Better Compensated!
Massive funding cuts to education are currently plaguing the State of California and the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD). As of the first reading of the Adopted Budget for 2010-2011 at the June 9th Board Meeting, district officials shared that the 2010-11 budget, $558 million, represents a cut of $110 million from the previous year's. This reduction includes the elimination of 505 full-time positions (or 10 percent). OUSD expects additional cuts mid-year once the State budget is approved.
The only way we can increase teacher salaries without cutting more jobs is a parcel tax.
With all of these funding cuts, one of the only ways that OUSD will be able to support its efforts to recruit, hire, and retain the highest quality teachers is by passing a parcel tax that will bring teacher compensation more on par with compensation levels found in other Bay Area districts.
On February 1, 2010, OUSD's Board Finance and Human Resources Committee considered two draft parcel tax proposals to increase teacher compensation in Oakland. While the proposals were tabled due to time constraints, the Committee agreed to consider a parcel tax proposal for the November 2010 election. In order to understand the possible public support for a November parcel tax, the Board of Education is conducting an opinion poll of likely November voters. The Board Finance and Human Resources Committee will review the results of this poll and will make a recommendation to the full board as to whether the parcel tax should be placed on the November ballot. The full board will likely meet in a special session to make a final decision before the August 6th Alameda County filing deadline.
Oaklanders should get to decide if they want our teachers to be paid more.
OUSD Board members' feelings about the parcel tax measure continue to be mixed. While some members have expressed doubts about getting enough voter support given the state of our local economy, others have shared concerns about the lack of support the Oakland Education Association has shown for a parcel tax that includes a 15 percent allocation to public charter schools. The issue of whether the tax will be a flat parcel tax or a square footage parcel tax is also still undecided.
What would a $20 - $25 million parcel tax mean for Oakland teachers? $25 million could translate into a 5 percent raise for all public school teachers in Oakland, with 80 percent of funds raised supporting district public school teachers and support staff.
For the Board of Education to place a parcel tax to increase teacher compensation on the November ballot, all stakeholder groups will need to join together around this issue.
A parcel tax is the single largest, most immediate, and least controversial source of revenue that can be applied to employee compensation.
Let the Board of Education know that you support a local parcel tax to increase teacher compensation. Email your board member today - OAKLAND TEACHERS DESERVE BETTER!
GO Photos from the Temescal Street Fair
GO Public Schools participated in this year's Temescal Street Fair! We asked community members "what makes a teacher great?" and received responses from Oakland students, teachers, parents, and community members.
Here are some photos from the day!
Visit GO at the Temescal Street Fair!
Support Oakland's public schools! Visit the GO Public Schools table at the Temescal Street Fair, this Sunday from noon - 6pm!
Get Updates & Alerts!
Upcoming Events
2/10/2012 GO Happy Hour 4:30 PM - 6:30 PM - Cato's Alehouse - 3891 Piedmont Avenue More >
Warning: ./cache is not writeable. Make sure you've set the correct relative or absolute path, and that the location is server-writable. in /home/oakc4/public_html/includes/simplepie.inc on line 1780